Term · academic

Gender minority stress and resilience (Testa)

Also called transgender minority stress, GMSR, misgendering stress, non-affirmation, internalized transphobia, trans resilience

The extra stress transgender and gender-diverse people carry because of how others treat their gender, and what helps them bear it. The Testa measure names nine parts: four that come from outside (discrimination, rejection, victimization and non-affirmation, meaning one’s gender going unrecognized), three that work from inside (internalized transphobia, expecting bad things to happen, and not disclosing), and two that protect (connection to a community and pride).

What drives it

One wrong pronoun can sting and pass. Being misgendered at work, at the pharmacy and at a family dinner in the same week adds up, and over time a person starts bracing before each new place or conversation. For identification the model separates stress that comes through other people from distress about the body, and it points to what may protect: in Bockting’s sample, contact with other transgender people.

How it shows

Work

Checking how a new team reacts before saying anything about pronouns. Correcting a colleague for the fifth time and deciding not to bother the sixth. Leaving a well-paid job for one where nobody makes jokes.

Relationships

Relatives who use the old name at holidays ‘by accident’ every year. Rehearsing how to introduce a partner. Feeling the room relax when another trans person walks in.

Self

Notice the scan you run before entering a new place, and how long it takes to come down after a hostile remark. Notice which people and places let you stop scanning.

What tells it apart

Minority stress (Meyer): Meyer’s model was built for lesbian, gay and bisexual people. The gender version adds non-affirmation, being seen and named as a gender one is not, and may be the closer fit when the stress centers on gender more than on whom someone loves.

Gender dysphoria (DSM-5-TR) and gender incongruence (ICD-11): Dysphoria is distress about the mismatch itself, often felt alone in front of a mirror. Minority stress comes through other people, and may be the larger part when distress drops in accepting company and rises with hostile treatment.

Gay-related rejection sensitivity (Pachankis): Rejection sensitivity is the anxious expectation of rejection. In the Testa measure that expectation is one part of nine, and the wider model may fit better when real rejection and discrimination are also happening.

A test

Ask the person to list where they spent time last week and rate each place for how much they had to brace. A clear gap between places, with distress rising where they were misgendered or turned away, may point to minority stress more than to something fixed inside them.

Questions to carry

  1. Before I walked into that room, what was I already preparing myself for?
  2. Where do I get to stop bracing, and who is there?

Go deeper

One book, one talk and one study, each on another site.

  • Study: Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence, Ilan H. Meyer, Psychological Bulletin, 2003. The paper that set out minority stress. Using meta-analyses of earlier studies, Meyer found higher rates of mental disorders among lesbian, gay and bisexual people than among heterosexual people. He explained the gap by stress from stigma: prejudice events, expecting rejection, hiding, and internalized homophobia, with coping that softens some of it. It is a review and a model, and later studies tested its parts. It covers lesbian, gay and bisexual people. Hendricks and Testa adapted it for trans people in 2012. The full text is free to read.

How strong the research is

moderate. Bockting and colleagues surveyed 1,093 transgender people online in 2003 (American Journal of Public Health, 2013): 44.1% scored in the range of clinical depression and 33.2% of anxiety, social stigma went with more psychological distress, and support from other transgender people weakened that link. Testa and colleagues built the Gender Minority Stress and Resilience measure with 844 participants (2015) and found good fit for its nine scales, which they called preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. In the ICD-11 field study in Mexico City (Robles and colleagues, 2016), 250 transgender adults recalled adolescence, and social rejection and violence strongly predicted distress and difficulty at home, school and work. Most of this research is cross-sectional and recruited online or through clinics, so it shows links without settling direction, and the authors of a 2020 study (Valente and colleagues) note that others have argued the arrow could also run the other way.

Where it comes from

Michael Hendricks and Rylan Testa, ‘A conceptual framework for clinical work with transgender and gender nonconforming clients: An adaptation of the Minority Stress Model’, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2012. Rylan Testa, Janice Habarth, Jayme Peta, Kimberly Balsam and Walter Bockting, ‘Development of the Gender Minority Stress and Resilience Measure’, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2015. Both build on Ilan Meyer’s minority stress model (2003)

Related