Conscious LivingGuided self-reflection

Who is behind Conscious Living.

Andrew Fayad designs the Conscious Living reflections. Each one draws on two sources: published research, and the work of the masters, who studied the mind by watching it, such as Master Dhyan Vimal.

Each reflection is a guided self-inquiry into one moment from your own life. You write what happened, and Conscious Living AI writes back, guided by research on that kind of situation. It ends on a question or a practical step you choose.

How it worksGet in touch

Andrew, who runs Conscious Living
Andrew, Conscious Living

Early testing

Our first reflections, one week of invited testing.

  • 27started
  • 21finished
  • 9kept a copy

Why the reflections are built this way.

  1. Why insight matters more than self-reflection
  2. How a reflection gets made
  3. What Conscious Living AI does
  4. What happens to what you write
  5. Sources and lineage

In one study, only insight was linked to all six parts of well-being.

One study that shaped our approach gave 121 college students questionnaires on several ways of paying attention to ourselves, and on six parts of psychological well-being. Insight here means how clearly we understand our own thoughts, feelings and behavior. Higher insight went with higher scores on all six, and on life satisfaction. No other measure did that.

  • Self-acceptance

    Holding a positive attitude toward ourselves, including qualities we like and qualities we don’t.

  • Positive relations

    Having warm, trusting relationships with other people.

  • Autonomy

    Acting from our own standards rather than relying on others' approval.

  • Environmental mastery

    Managing the demands of daily life.

  • Purpose in life

    Having goals and a sense of direction.

  • Personal growth

    Continuing to develop, and seeing ourselves as capable of change.

What else the study found

Self-reflection
How much we examine our own thoughts and behavior, from the same scale as insight. It did not predict well-being on any of the six.
Reflection
A second reflection measure, from the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire, went with higher Personal Growth, one of the six.
Rumination
Higher rumination went with lower scores on three of the six.

Harrington & Loffredo (2011). The Journal of Psychology, 145(1), 39-57. 121 college students who answered questionnaires about themselves. A study like this shows links, not causes. Read the paper

This study did not test Conscious Living, and it does not show that insight causes well-being. It shaped one design choice: each reflection is written to end on something specific we can see, a question or a step. The study did not test that choice.

Five steps before anyone sees a reflection.

  1. Start with the situation

    We define what the reflection is there to look at, and where it stops.

  2. Read the research

    We read published work on that situation in full, and we don’t turn a study into advice.

  3. Write the boundaries

    We write what Conscious Living AI may ask, what it must not assume, and that it must never diagnose or tell anyone what to do.

  4. Test it

    We run it many times, looking for invented details, advice and overstatement.

  5. Check the output

    Before the site shows what Conscious Living AI wrote, a program checks it for words we’ve ruled out and for any number, day or name the person never gave. If it fails, Conscious Living AI writes it again, once. If it fails twice, it is shown anyway and the failure is counted. The check misses some mistakes.

Conscious Living AI writes what comes back. We set the structure and the limits around it.

We give it two things: what the person wrote in the reflection, and our instructions for that situation. The instructions keep what it writes close to what happened. They rule out diagnosis and advice, and they bring the reflection to an end before it turns into an open conversation.

It can still get things wrong, so we test every reflection and check what it writes.

Every reflection runs inside limits like these

  • No motives, history or details the person did not give.
  • No diagnosis, and no labels for the person.
  • No deciding what the person should do.
  • What it writes stays on the moment the person described.
  • Each reflection ends on a question or a step.

We don’t store free reflections.

  • Free reflections

    The text of a free reflection never goes into our database or our application logs.

  • Model processing

    So Conscious Living AI can write back, we send the text to Anthropic, the company that makes the AI model. Its terms exclude training on that text by default and limit how long Anthropic keeps it.

  • Plus membership

    Plus saves every reflection a signed-in member gets (guided reflections, situation reflections, Library searches and “Try it” exercises) and their self-check results, so they can read them alongside later ones. Members can turn automatic saving off in their account.

  • If the system changes

    This page describes how the system works today. When the system changes, we update this page.

The person behind it.

I’m Andrew. I’ve founded and built companies, and what holds my attention is personal growth and transformation. I live between Malaysia and New York. For years I’ve been studying with Master Dhyan Vimal. He founded the Dhyan Vimal Institute for Higher Learning, which is dedicated to the transformation of humanity as a personal transformation.

Conscious Living is where that attention goes. I find the research, design the reflections, test them through the five steps above, and design the pages.

I’m not a therapist or a coach, and I’m not trying to become one. What I care about is the moment we see something specific about ourselves, clearly enough to grow from it.

How it started

It started with a situation that was bothering me. I took it to an AI chat and the conversation was good, but it never got anywhere. I’d finish with plenty said and no clear direction.

I’m an overthinker. A conversation ends and I keep running it, looking for the line I should have said. What I wanted was an ending: one thing about the loop I could see more clearly, and carry into the next time it starts.

The work with Master Dhyan Vimal goes much further than anything here, and nothing on this site replaces it. What a reflection can do is start the looking: one moment, taken seriously, until something specific shows up.

So I built the first reflection for a reaction I keep having. Most of the time went into the instructions that keep Conscious Living AI moving toward one clear thing we can use.

Friends tried it and told me what they wanted next. That’s where the others came from, like Fear, for the thing we keep putting off, and Not Feeling Heard, for the moment nobody responded. Each one is made for one situation.

The research came one situation at a time. The work is already published, and most of us never get near it. Each reflection is built on research into its situation, so what we bring gets looked at through something sturdier than our own account of it. That’s Conscious Living AI’s job: putting the research to work on the moment in front of us.

The name Conscious Living comes from Master Dhyan Vimal.

Two sources, one question.

Looking at ourselves through questions is old. Socrates taught through questions, and Krishnamurti through inquiry. Master Dhyan Vimal's work shaped how Conscious Living asks.

When a study informs a reflection, we name the study, say what it found, and say what it didn’t show.

Studies and the work of the masters shape the questions. What is true about you is for you to see.

  • Research

    What a published study measured and found.

  • The masters

    What a named master said, quoted whole, or paraphrased and marked as such.

  • Inquiry

    The question we ask, drawn from those sources. Asking it doesn’t claim the source answered it.

  • Insight, rumination and self-reflection

    Harrington & Loffredo (2011). The Journal of Psychology, 145(1), 39-57.

    In 121 college students, higher scores on the Insight measure of the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale went with higher scores on all six parts of psychological well-being and on life satisfaction. No other measure did that. Higher rumination went with lower scores on three. A second reflection measure went with higher Personal Growth. The study is self-report and correlational, so it can’t show what causes what. Read the paper

  • Brooding and reflection

    Treynor, Gonzalez & Nolen-Hoeksema (2003). Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(3), 247-259.

    In a group of 1,328 adults, people said what they tend to do when they feel down, and 1,130 of them were measured again a year later. Brooding, which is dwelling on why we feel low, went with more depressive symptoms, both at the time and a year later. Reflection went with slightly more symptoms at the time and slightly fewer a year later. The link with reflection is small, and each habit was measured by five questions. This research informs the Overthinking reflection. Read the paper

  • The worry we can’t picture

    Stöber & Borkovec (2002). Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(1), 89-96.

    Eleven clients with generalized anxiety disorder described their worries less concretely than 23 people without that diagnosis. After 14 weeks of therapy, their descriptions were as concrete as the other group’s. The authors called their findings preliminary. This research informs the Overthinking reflection. Read the paper

  • Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought

    Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 163-206.

    A review that set rumination and worry side by side as two forms of repetitive thought. It found that repetitive thought can help or harm, and named three things that seem to decide which: whether the thoughts are negative or positive, the situation the thinking happens in, and how abstract or concrete it is. The review offers these as likely explanations that still need testing. This research informs the Overthinking reflection. Read the paper

  • Procrastination and short-term mood

    Sirois & Pychyl (2013). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2), 115-127.

    A review of earlier research. It argues that procrastination has a great deal to do with short-term mood repair: we delay the task because it brings an unpleasant feeling, and delaying it makes the feeling go away for now. This research informs the Fear reflection. Read the paper Free copy

  • Immune neglect: forgetting how well we recover

    Gilbert, Pinel, Wilson, Blumberg & Wheatley (1998). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 617-638.

    Across six studies, people predicting how they would feel after a bad event consistently overestimated how long the bad feeling would last. The authors call the blind spot behind this immune neglect: we forget how well we recover. The studies were mostly with students and staff at US universities. They show a common error in predicting our feelings. They don’t show that any particular outcome will be fine. This research informs the Fear reflection. Read the paper

  • Implementation intentions

    Gollwitzer & Sheeran (2006). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119.

    Across 94 pooled tests, plans that say when, where and how we will act had a medium-to-large effect on reaching the goal, and a similar effect on getting started. Most of the goals were ones people already wanted, like exercising or getting a health check. This research informs the Fear reflection. Read the paper Free copy

  • Cyberostracism: being left out online

    Williams, Cheung & Choi (2000). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748-762.

    In an online study with 1,486 people from 62 countries, being left out of a simple ball-tossing game by strangers on a screen made people feel worse, less in control, and less like they belonged. In a second study, people who had been left out were more likely to go along with the group on the next task. This research informs the Not Feeling Heard reflection. Read the paper

  • High-quality listening

    Itzchakov, Kluger & Castro (2017). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 105-120.

    Across four experiments, people who were listened to with attention, empathy and no judgment felt less anxious, got less defensive, and could see more than one side of their own view. This research informs the Not Feeling Heard reflection. Read the paper

  • The ideal road not taken

    Davidai & Gilovich (2018). Emotion, 18(3), 439-452.

    Across six studies, lasting regrets were more often about the ideal self, the person we hoped to become, than the ought self, our duties and responsibilities. Asked for their single biggest regret in life, 76% named an ideal-self regret and 24% an ought-self regret. This research informs the Feeling Behind and End of Year reflections. Read the paper

  • Social comparison and social media

    Vogel, Rose, Roberts & Eckles (2014). Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206-222.

    In two studies with students, people who used Facebook most had lower self-esteem, and that link was tied to how often they saw people doing better than them. People who looked at a profile of someone doing well rated themselves lower right afterward. The first study shows a link and can’t show that Facebook lowered anyone’s self-esteem. This research informs the Feeling Behind reflection. Read the paper Free copy

  • How awkward a no feels

    Flynn & Lake (2008). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 128-143.

    In three field studies, students and charity volunteers asked strangers for small favors after guessing how many people they would need to ask. They needed about half as many as they guessed. In a later study, the people asking thought about what a yes would cost the other person and missed how awkward a no feels. Most were students in New York, asking strangers. This research informs the People Pleasing reflection. Read the paper Free copy

  • Saying no lands softer than we think

    Givi & Kirk (2023). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

    In five experiments with about 2,000 adults recruited online, people turning down an invitation expected more anger and hurt, and fewer future invitations, than the people inviting them reported. Four experiments used imagined invitations and one used real couples. The invitations were small, everyday ones, and the study did not test how a no lands with someone who punishes it. This research informs the People Pleasing reflection. Read the paper Free copy

  • Caring for others, and caring at our own cost

    Le, Impett, Lemay, Muise & Tskhay (2018). Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 1-25.

    A review of 100 groups of people, 26,645 in all. Caring about other people's needs went with better well-being and better relationships. Care that left out a person's own needs went with slightly better relationships and no gain in their own well-being. The review shows which things go together, so it can't show what causes what, and almost all the groups came from North America and Europe. This research informs the People Pleasing reflection. Read the paper Free copy

  • A few moments stand in for an experience

    Fredrickson & Kahneman (1993). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 45-55.

    In two experiments, 32 people watched aversive and pleasant film clips of different lengths and rated how they felt in real time, then gave an overall rating. A further 96 people ranked the clips later. How long a clip lasted had only a small effect on the overall judgment, which looked like a weighted average of snapshots. The clips lasted a few minutes in a lab. A year is not a clip, so applying this to a year is our reasoning and not a finding. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • Adding a better end

    Kahneman, Fredrickson, Schreiber & Redelmeier (1993). Psychological Science, 4(6), 401-405.

    People held a hand in cold water for 60 seconds, and in another trial for 60 seconds plus 30 more in slightly warmer water. A significant majority chose to repeat the longer trial. The authors' summary is that judgments of such experiences are often dominated by the discomfort at the worst and final moments. This was one minute of cold water, so it is the smallest scale at which the idea has been tested. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • Life is pleasant, and memory helps

    Walker, Skowronski & Thompson (2003). Review of General Psychology, 7(2), 203-210.

    A review of studies of autobiographical memory. People perceive more events as pleasant than unpleasant, and the feeling attached to unpleasant events fades faster than the feeling attached to pleasant ones. Mild depression disrupted this pattern. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • From chump to champ

    Wilson & Ross (2001). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 572-584.

    In six studies, people were more critical of their distant past selves than of their present selves, even when ratings made at the time showed no real improvement, and saw more improvement in themselves than in acquaintances or siblings. The reflection never grades the person someone was earlier in the year. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • When bad things turn good

    McAdams, Reynolds, Lewis, Patten & Bowman (2001). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(4), 474-485.

    Midlife adults aged 35 to 65 and undergraduates gave long accounts of high points, low points and turning points. Accounts where a bad event turned good went with higher well-being in both groups. Accounts where a good event turned bad went with lower well-being among the midlife adults. This shows a link in how people tell their lives, not that telling it differently helps, which is why the reflection never asks for a silver lining. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • Difficult events across four countries

    Turner, Thomsen, Tuval-Mashiach and colleagues (2024). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 127(6), 1263-1287.

    438 adults in Japan, Denmark, Israel and the United States wrote about low points and challenges. The biggest differences between countries were in redemption and meaning-making, so a good ending is not a universal way to tell a hard event. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • Narrative identity and well-being

    Adler, Lodi-Smith, Philippe & Houle (2016). Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(2), 142-175.

    A review of how the themes in people's life stories relate to well-being. The link is strongest for motivational, affective and integrative-meaning themes. The Psychology Library rates this moderate: it is largely correlational and Western. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • Letting go of unreachable goals

    Wrosch, Scheier, Miller, Schulz & Carver (2003). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1494-1508.

    Three studies: 115 undergraduates, 120 young and older adults, and 45 parents of children with cancer and of healthy children. Being able to let go of unreachable goals and take up others went with higher well-being. The measures were self-reported and the samples small, and the studies show links only. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • The fresh start effect

    Dai, Milkman & Riis (2014). Management Science, 60(10), 2563-2582.

    Three archival studies of Google searches for "diet", gym visits and commitments to goals found that all three rose after temporal landmarks such as a new week, month or year. The authors suggest landmarks start a new mental accounting period. The study is correlational, and its summary does not say how long the rises last. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • When asking why does not hurt

    Kross, Ayduk & Mischel (2005). Psychological Science, 16(9), 709-715.

    In two experiments, people who recalled an anger-eliciting experience from a self-distanced view and focused on why processed it without stirring up as much negative feeling. Whether reading a description of your moment written from outside does the same thing has not been tested, so the reflection's outside view rests on this work by analogy. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • From a distance

    Ayduk & Kross (2010). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(5), 809-829.

    In three studies, spontaneous self-distancing went with less emotional reactivity when people thought about a negative experience, and was related to trait rumination while explaining unique variance. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • Rumination and reflection are different

    Trapnell & Campbell (1999). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 284-304.

    Rumination and reflection are distinct dispositions with different motives. Looking back at a year can turn into a loop, so this reflection is built to end: three steps, specific moments and one question. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • Rethinking rumination

    Nolen-Hoeksema, Wisco & Lyubomirsky (2008). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400-424.

    A review. Rumination exacerbates depression, enhances negative thinking, impairs problem solving and erodes social support, and it appears more consistently to predict the onset of depression than its duration. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • Writing about what matters

    Frattaroli (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 823-865.

    A meta-analysis of 146 randomized studies of writing or talking about personal and meaningful topics. On average the result was positive and significant but small (r = .075), with moderators. The summary does not describe the moderators or any harm, so the reflection promises nothing from the writing. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • The experience of regret

    Gilovich & Medvec (1995). Psychological Review, 102(2), 379-395.

    A review. Actions bring more regret in the short term and inactions more in the long run. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • What we regret most

    Roese & Summerville (2005). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(9), 1273-1285.

    A meta-analysis of 11 studies that ranked regrets. The biggest regrets track where people see the most opportunity: education, career, romance, parenting, the self and leisure. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

  • Counterfactual thinking

    Roese (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 133-148.

    A review. Counterfactual thinking, imagining how things could have gone differently, is activated by negative feeling and has both aversive and beneficial effects. This research informs the End of Year Reflection. Read the paper

Get in touch.

We welcome corrections, especially about the research.