Term · academic

Social comparison

Also called upward and downward comparison, self-evaluation maintenance

Evaluating your abilities, opinions and status by comparing yourself with others. Upward comparison (with those better off) can inspire or deflate; downward comparison (with those worse off) usually comforts.

What drives it

It gives a sense of where you stand when there is no objective measure. Tesser's insight: comparison hurts most with people close to you in a domain that matters to your identity, so friends and colleagues are the most dangerous comparison targets.

How it shows

Work

Salary checking, title envy, keeping track of who was invited to which meeting. A high performer becomes destabilised when a peer is promoted, even though their own situation has not changed. Leaders who compare themselves with founders of larger companies and feel like failures despite real success. Watch for distancing from a successful close colleague (Tesser's model: you either reduce closeness or downgrade the domain).

Relationships

Siblings measured against each other for life. Couples who track which friends are buying houses or having children. Instagram scrolling followed by low mood.

Self

You feel a drop in mood after hearing of a peer's success and a guilty lift at a peer's setback. You may notice you quietly lose interest in a friend after they succeed in your field.

What tells it apart

Envy: Social comparison is the process; envy is one painful outcome of upward comparison when you want what the other has and feel you cannot get it.

Mimetic desire (Girard): Social comparison measures you against others; mimetic desire is about wanting what a model wants because they want it. Comparison can happen without any shared object of desire.

Contingent self-worth: Contingent self-worth is the vulnerability that makes comparison painful; comparison itself happens in people with stable worth too, but stings less.

A test

Notice whom you compare yourself with and how you feel afterwards; if your mood depends on peers' success more than on your own progress, comparison is driving your self-evaluation.

Questions to carry

  1. Whose success shifts the mood most, and how close are they in a domain that matters?
  2. Which friend's good news is hardest for me to hear, and what does it say about where I stand?
Take it furtherBring one real moment of it to the Feeling Behind inquiry.Free, about 3 minutes, no account.

How strong the research is

strong

Where it comes from

Leon Festinger, 1954; Thomas Wills, 1981 (downward comparison); Abraham Tesser, 1988 (self-evaluation maintenance model)

Sources

  • René Girard, Deceit, Desire and the Novel (Mensonge romantique et vérité romanesque) (1961)

Related